JUSTIFICACIÓN.-
Aunque el estudio que reseñamos a continuación, refleja mayor precisión con CBCT. La áreas que presentaron mayor dificultad, fueron aquellas con secciones oblicuas o inclinadas en relación con el recorrido de la medición.
Plantaemoos un estudio de investigación. Con el siguiente Ojetivo Primario:
PRECISON DE LAS MEDIDAS OBLICUAS E INCLINADAS EN AMBOS MAXILARES, ASI COMO LA RELACIÓN DE LAS MISMAS A LA MODIFICACIÓN DE PLANOS.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reliability of linear
measurements of edentulous ridges recorded from 16-row multidetector CT (MDCT) images
and cone beam CT (CBCT) images acquired using a flat panel detector (FPD) with a large
field of view (FOV), both independently and in comparison with each other.
Conclusions: Both MDCT and CBCT were associated with a clinically and statistically
significant measurement error. CBCT measurements were significantly more accurate than
those of MDCT. The measurements recorded from both modalities had a high inter and
intraexaminer reliability. Accuracy of measurements was found to be more operator
dependent with CBCT than with MDCT.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2011) 40, 67–75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065.
AA Al-Ekrish*,1 and M Ekram2
